Electoral College Essay, history homework help

Content

15.0 %Describe the structure and function of the electoral college including how, when, why, and by whom it was created.

Essay does not describe the structure and function of the electoral college including how, when, why, and by whom it was created.

Description of the structure and function of the electoral college including how, when, why, and by whom it was created is incomplete.

Description of the structure and function of the electoral college including how, when, why, and by whom it was created is complete.

Description of the structure and function of the electoral college including how, when, why, and by whom it was created is complete, clear, and coherent.

Description of the structure and function of the electoral college including how, when, why, and by whom it was created is complete, clear, and coherent; higher-order thinking is evident.

30.0 %Compare the electoral college to a popular vote approach for elections. How does the electoral college system operate/function? What are consequences of using an electoral college system versus a popular vote? Use the 2000 presidential election as an example.

Essay does not compare the electoral college to a popular vote approach for elections, and does not address how the electoral college system operates/functions, or discuss the consequences of using an electoral college system versus a popular vote. Also does not use the 2000 presidential election as an example.

Comparison of the electoral college to a popular vote approach for elections is incomplete or inconsistent; does not address how the electoral college system operates/functions, or discuss the consequences of using an electoral college system versus a popular vote in a satisfactory manner. Also does not use the 2000 presidential election as an example.

Comparison of the electoral college to a popular vote approach for elections is complete; addresses how the electoral college system operates/functions, and discusses the consequences of using an electoral college system versus a popular vote in a satisfactory manner. Uses the 2000 presidential election as an example.

Comparison of the electoral college to a popular vote approach for elections is complete, clear, and coherent; addresses how the electoral college system operates/functions, and discusses the consequences of using an electoral college system versus a popular vote in an in-depth manner. Uses the 2000 presidential election as an example.

Comparison of the electoral college to a popular vote approach for elections is complete, clear, and coherent; addresses how the electoral college system operates/functions, and discusses the consequences of using an electoral college system versus a popular vote in an in-depth manner. Uses the 2000 presidential election as an example. Higher-order thinking is evident.

25.0 %Assess the value of an individual citizen’s vote under the electoral college system. Why does the U.S. still use the electoral college for presidential elections today?

Essay does not asses the value of an individual citizen’s vote under the electoral college system or address why the U.S. still uses the electoral college for presidential elections today.

Essay attempts to asses the value of an individual citizen’s vote under the electoral college system or address why the U.S. still uses the electoral college for presidential elections today, but in a less than satisfactory manner.

Essay assesses the value of an individual citizen’s vote under the electoral college system or address why the U.S. still uses the electoral college for presidential elections today in a satisfactory manner.

Essay assesses the value of an individual citizen’s vote under the electoral college system or address why the U.S. still uses the electoral college for presidential elections today in a satisfactory manner. Rationale is clear and coherent.

Essay assesses the value of an individual citizen’s vote under the electoral college system or address why the U.S. still uses the electoral college for presidential elections today in a satisfactory manner. Rationale is clear, coherent, and persuasive. Higher-order thinking is evident.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)

No reference page is included. No citations are used.

Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present

Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.