From a manager’s perspective, create a training manual for the leader(s) focused on strategic planning that addresses the following: Define and explain the purpose of strategic planning.

/in /by
  • Revisit the Unit 1 Assessment to recall the following:
    • The professional experience summarized. Consider the leader(s) that was in charge during the planning and implementation of that change.
    • The leadership skills that were presented by the leader throughout the change process.
    • The challenges and recommendations for a strategic plan to mitigate those challenges in the Unit 1 Assessment.
  • From a manager’s perspective, create a training manual for the leader(s) focused on strategic planning that addresses the following:
    • Define and explain the purpose of strategic planning.
    • Explain the role of the leader in the organization (this should be specific to the example provided in Unit 1).
    • Describe at least 3 leadership qualities that contribute to successful strategic planning.
    • Describe how the leader(s) should approach situations for optimal results, using at least 1 successful and 1 challenging example to illustrate.
    • Include a title page, table of contents, reference page.
  • Complete additional research on this topic as necessary, including at least 2 references, formatted APA style.

Estimated time to complete: 3 hours

Rubric

HC466 – Unit 2 Assignment – Training Manual

HC466 – Unit 2 Assignment – Training Manual
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
40.0 ptsLevel 5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

 36.0 ptsLevel 4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

 32.0 ptsLevel 3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

 28.0 ptsLevel 2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

 24.0 ptsLevel 1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.

 0.0 ptsLevel 0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P
40.0 ptsLevel 5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 36.0 ptsLevel 4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 32.0 ptsLevel 3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 28.0 ptsLevel 2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

 24.0 ptsLevel 1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

 0.0 ptsLevel 0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
10.0 ptsLevel 5

The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

 9.0 ptsLevel 4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

 8.0 ptsLevel 3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

 7.0 ptsLevel 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

 6.0 ptsLevel 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

 0.0 ptsLevel 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I
10.0 ptsLevel 5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

 9.0 ptsLevel 4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 8.0 ptsLevel 3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 7.0 ptsLevel 2

The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 6.0 ptsLevel 1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

 0.0 ptsLevel 0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.
10.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0