HUM101 Chamberlain Evidence Based Practice Bibliography and Source Evaluation

Attached is more instructions that needed to be followed

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

• Textbook: Chapter 8, 9
• Lesson
• Link (Word doc): Source Evaluation Worksheet
• Minimum of 5 scholarly sources

Instructions
Use the Source Evaluation Worksheet
to submit an annotated bibliography of 5 sources that you intend to use
in your paper. Prepare a citation, annotation, and evaluation for each
source.

You may collect the worksheets together as one document or you may submit a separate worksheet for each source.

Click on the following link for an example of an annotation.

Link: Annotation Example

Waite, L. J., Goldschneider, F. K., & Witsberger, C. (1986).
Nonfamily living and the erosion of traditional family orientations
among young adults. American Sociological Review, 51, 541-554.

The authors, researchers at the Rand Corporation and Brown
University, use data from the National Longitudinal Surveys of Young
Women and Young Men to test their hypothesis that nonfamily living by
young adults alters their attitudes, values, plans, and expectations,
moving them away from their belief in traditional sex roles. They find
their hypothesis strongly supported in young females, while the effects
were fewer in studies of young males. Increasing the time away from
parents before marrying increased individualism, self-sufficiency, and
changes in attitudes about families. In contrast, an earlier study by
Williams cited below shows no significant gender differences in sex role
attitudes as a result of nonfamily living.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

• Length: 100-150 words per source (not including title page or references page)
• 1-inch margins
• Double spaced
• 12-point Times New Roman font
• Title page

Grading
This activity will be graded using the Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric.

Course Outcomes (CO): 3, 5

Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

Rubric

Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric – 50 pts

Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric – 50 pts

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Quantity of Sources

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Quality /Reliability of Sources

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Recency of Sources

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Writing Fluency of Annotations

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
APA and Documentation