i need a continuation of the paper please

Hi.

this is the instruction for this weeks assignment. I also added my instructors comments about the one that was due last Sunday, below (at the very end). Also attached the last paper for you.

Write a short paper (3-5 pages) applying skills learned from Modules 1-4 in order to identify and describe the past literature conducted on your chosen research topic that you will need to complete your final research proposal.

In this paper, you should provide some empirical justification for why your topic is important to study and identify and review the major studies previously conducted to examine the topic in the past. When writing the literature review, keep in mind that you do not want to summarize each study, but integrate the common ideas, topics, and results.

Your Literature Review Paper should be 3-5 pages long, and it should include all of the following topics:

1. Justification for why your topic is important to study.
2. Identify and review the past major studies previously conducted on your chosen topic.
3. Identify the methodological strengths and weaknesses of these studies.
4. A minimum of 6 references that come exclusively from peer-reviewed journals, scholarly books, and governmental records or reports.
5. Anything else that you feel is appropriate to defending your position.

All of these assignments should be typed; double-spaced; with 12-point Times New Roman, Calibri, or Arial font; and with one-inch margins. Use a formal writing tone that reflects a thoughtful synthesis of the many principles covered in the course, and that exhibits a high level of professionalism. You need a strong thesis, clear organization, lucid points, a formal tone, conventional use of language, and formatting in the APA style.

3. Literature Review Paper

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompletion	5.0 pts Proficient Paper fully addresses all required subjects in the instructions. 2.5 pts Competent One required subject from the instructions was missing or was not fully addressed. 0.0 pts No Credit Two or more required subjects from the instructions were missing or were not fully addressed.	5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelevance	5.0 pts Proficient Topic chosen is relevant, appropriate to the course, and sufficient in scope. 2.5 pts Competent Topic is somewhat inappropriate to the course, AND/OR is somewhat too wide or too narrow in scope. 0.0 pts No Credit Topic is not relevant or appropriate to the course AND/OR is extremely wide or extremely narrow in scope.	5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis	5.0 pts Proficient Paper demonstrates clear, logical thinking, supported by evidence. 2.5 pts Competent One or two places in the paper were unclear or not based in logic and evidence. 0.0 pts No Credit Three or more places in the paper were unclear or not based in logic and evidence.	5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength	2.5 pts Proficient Paper is 3-5 pages long. 1.25 pts Competent Paper is 1-2 or 6-7 pages long 0.0 pts No Credit Paper is less than one page long, or more than seven pages.	2.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLanguage Mechanics	5.0 pts Proficient Conventional, correct language mechanics were used, with no more than two mistakes in grammar, spelling, or punctuation. 2.5 pts Competent Three to five language mechanical errors were made. 0.0 pts No Credit Six or more language mechanical errors were made.	5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting	2.5 pts Proficient Paper meets all formatting requirements (double-spaced, 12-point font, 1-inch margins, and proper title) 1.25 pts Competent Paper has one formatting mistake. 0.0 pts No Credit Paper has two or more formatting mistakes.	2.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences	5.0 pts Proficient Paper covers at least 6 references from high-quality, academic or governmental sources. 2.5 pts Competent Paper covers only 5 references from high-quality, academic or governmental sources. 0.0 pts No Credit Paper covers 4 or fewer references from high-quality, academic or governmental sources.	5.0 pts
Total Points: 30.0

Comments from my instructor about the last paper that was due last week.

Comments:

Your paper was well written. However, your topic seems to be difficult for you to write about. I really suggest that you pick a simpler topic if possible. I was quite confused about your experimental approach while reading this paper. You mention recidivism, which led me to believe that you would be looking at actual offenders and recidivism. For example, comparing the recidivism of a group of inmates that went through community corrections and a group of inmates that went through the traditional process/did not participate in community corrections. However, you then discuss interviewing people. Who exactly would you be interviewing? I would assume that you could obtain recidivism data from public records. Also, you don’t define community corrections or tell me what it entails. Remember, you are writing this paper as if this person has no knowledge of research methods or your topic of choice. There are many community corrections programs being used. For example, there is family therapy and programs for the mentally ill. The best approach would be to pick a specific community corrections program and look at the effectiveness rather than looking at community corrections overall. This would make the study even more complicated. I really hope you take my notes into consideration before completing your next assignment. Please email me if you have any questions. Good job!

Thank you.