In 750-1,000 words, consider the case of Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California to answer the following: Discuss why the case is important to mental health clinicians.

/in /by

In 750-1,000 words, consider the case of Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California to answer the following:

  1. Discuss why the case is important to mental health clinicians.
  2. Describe the violence risk assessment instruments a clinician might use to meet the requirements provided for in Tarasoff.
  3. Discuss if a clinician should be held civilly liable for violent behavior of an inmate the clinician assessed.

Provide three to five peer reviewed resources to support your explanations.

Link To Case: https://advance-lexis-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/document/index?crid=1e2c538b-9e56-4abe-a8dc-60f58d30e5d4&pdpermalink=dffcea3e-50cc-470f-a34f-0e3d375422d8&pdmfid=1516831&pdisurlapi=true