rhetorically compare two editorials on your research topic

one from the NYT and one found using a google search.

Editorial 1: author(s), title, publication, date

Editorial 2: author(s), title, publication, date

What is the title of each editorial? Which title do you find more effective in terms of grabbing your attention and reflecting the authorâ€™s argument? Why?
Compare the opening hook of each editorial: how does each open â€“ ie anecdote, statistic, fact, example, question, etc. Which hook is more effective? Why?
Look for a few examples of the author using emotionally charged diction in each editorial. Which is more effective in terms of evoking an emotional response from readers? Why?
What types of evidence does each author use to support/build their argument? Which has stronger, more convincing evidence, and why?
Overall, which editorial do you find the most convincing and why? Explain.
What did you learn from these two editorials about arguing your topic? About how to write your own editorial?